5 destinations in Europe for your Easter trip

5 cheap Easter destinations
Travel to fantastic places at incredible prices

Still do not know where to travel this Easter? If you are passionate about traveling and your desire is to leave Spain, with these offers that we show you, you can do it at a great price!
Have you always wanted to know Paris but you have never cared for economic reasons? Now you can take a walk through the Elysian fields and take a picture next to the Eiffel Tower!
Ferratum offers you quick personal loans that will help you travel to your dream place this Easter.
Ferratum is always by your side, offering you the best service and accompanying you on your trips.

Request a quick credit with us and enjoy a few days of rest.
With our immediate loans , the walks through the streets of Dublin or Brussels will be magical, and you will taste with emotion your typical dishes in the best company.
Also do not forget to bring everything you need. Apply for a credit online and buy warm clothes to face the cold of northern countries or, on the contrary, acquire a swimsuit and light clothing if your destination is in the south. Pay off your debts and enjoy your trip thanks to the peace of mind provided by Ferratum’s fast microcredit .

If you are a lover of beauty and can not resist the charm of traveling, of knowing new cultures and different customs, monuments and gastronomy of interesting cities … List any of them on your list of possible destinations for Easter! Do not you know which one to decide? Do not worry, Ferratum wants to help you make the decision and that’s why it offers you approximate information on prices and plans.

Here we leave you 5 cheap European destinations for your Easter trip :

  1. Budapest, Hungary

Budapest is the capital of Hungary, and is undoubtedly the most important city in the country. With the passage of time it has become, by its own merits, one of the most visited cities in Europe.
It is ranked No. 9 on the list of the largest population of European cities. At present it has a 1.7 million inhabitants, without taking into account the metropolitan area, because if we look at this area the figure reaches a whopping 2.5 million people.

What to visit in Budapest?

The Parliament of Budapest, the famous Buda Castle … Here you can see the most interesting monuments and places to visit in Budapest.

At what price can I travel to the capital of Belgium?

You will find flights from € 54 person! Do not let this chance go away. Travel to Hungary this Holy Week.

  1. Dublin, Ireland

They say that Dublin is as friendly as a town and as intimate as a pub, and that if you visit Dublin once, there will be a second, because it is a city that captivates you from the first moment. It was founded by the Vikings in the early ninth century, is the capital of Ireland and has been the scene of wars and conflicts until it managed to forge its own identity in the twentieth century. Its interesting historical past gives Dublin the concept of modernity, this concept fused with the Gaelic tradition make this city one of the most interesting in Europe.

What to visit in Dublin?

Dublin is literature, cradle and muse, since it served as inspiration to great writers like James Joyce, Oscar Wilde, Samuel Beckett, or Bram Stoker
The Castle of Dublin, The Casino Marino … there are many buildings, monuments and streets of Dublin that can serve you as inspiration.

At what price can I travel to the capital of Ireland?

From 47 euros you can enjoy this magnificent city!

  1. Paris, France

Paris is the capital of France and is known, for its great beauty, as the city of love. It is, without doubt, one of the most visited capitals in the world. From the tourist point of view, Paris is the most visited city in Europe.
Escape a few days with your partner and live a perfect romantic evening. And if you have a large family … Take your children to Paris!

What to visit in Paris?

The Eiffel Tower, The Palace of Versailles, The Arc de Triomphe … The buildings and monuments of Paris are extremely beautiful and have great historical interest, so everyone must visit them at least once in their life.
Take advantage of Holy Week to know them all!

At what price can I travel to the capital of France?

Fly to the city of light and love from € 31! Do not you give credit? This Holy Week visits Paris at the price of scandal.

  1. Sardinia, Italy

The Italian island of Sardinia , bathed by the Mediterranean Sea, is the best idea to enjoy the Easter holidays.
If you want to enjoy the sun, the authentic Italian cuisine and the walks on the beach … this is your best option.

What to visit in Sardinia?

If you travel to this part of Italy you are obliged to visit the different towns of the island of Sardinia.

At what price can I travel to the Italian island?

You can travel to Sardinia from € 214. It is a unique opportunity that you can not miss!

  1. Warsaw, Poland

Poland is one of the cheapest countries in Europe but it is no less interesting. Its capital, Warsaw, is a city that is located in the center of the country and is located on the main international transit routes. The city has a population of almost 1.7 million inhabitants. It is rich in history and culture since it was one of the cities that suffered the most during World War II.

What to visit in Warsaw?

The Prague Neighborhood, the Palace of Culture … there are many buildings and monuments in Warsaw that you can not miss. Try to make the most of the time and visit them all!

At what price can I travel to the Italian island?

Find cheap flights to Warsaw from € 60!

Do you want to enjoy this trip to the fullest but you do not have enough money? Do not worry! Ask for your quick loan with us and problem solved!

Remember that you can request online microcredits from 50 to 700 euros to pay from 5 to 45 days without complications. Ferratum recommends that you get a good camera to immortalize incredible moments.

Ask for your immediate online loans and get to know wonderful places. Get your money now , from € 50 to € 700, to pay between 5 and 45 days. In just 15 minutes you will have the microcredit in your account. Request your quick money loan without the need for waiting, long procedures and photocopies.

Greece crisis – Europe has learned

Greece Smart by crisis

An important news threatens to drown in the noise of the asylum dispute: This Thursday, Greece should be released into economic freedom. After eight long years of nocturnal rescue attempts, bad words, broken promises, German austerity dictatorships and Greek suffering, a little edifying chapter in the young history of the Eurozone is slammed. All 19 euro countries will be independent again. And, what is particularly important for the future, the decisive lesson has been drawn.

Attempts had been made to solve the Greek crisis by trial and error because there was no better solution. Much has been tried, most discarded. It is no coincidence that Germany and France, just as they grant Athens their sovereignty again, present a reform agenda for the monetary union that renounces austerity. Saving alone does not make a troubled country stand up, it will soon need reforms and financial support, so the message of Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron can be summarized. It can be read like a confession of guilt. All the proposals suggest that a history of suffering such as the Greek one should not be repeated, which was accompanied by mass unemployment, pension cuts, economic decline and constant new elections.

Europe has learned a few things: Saving alone does not bring a troubled country to its feet

It applies the old knowledge: Who wants to drive a different course, must realign the tax. Therefore, it is right that Merkel and Macron want to rebuild the euro zone in such a way that it can react quickly and unbureaucratically in the future. They want to create a budget for the Eurozone, which helps governments in bad times to invest in education and training or in keeping with age. If a country unexpectedly gets into trouble, as it did in the financial crisis Ireland and Spain, short-term loans with a modest reform requirement should help alleviate the consequences. In addition, another safety net for savings deposits is provided.

#

Should Athens receive debt relief?

Shortly before the consultation on the last package of aid to Greece is announced that Germany has benefited from the rescue operations. Green household expert Kindler therefore calls for debt relief. What do you mean? more …

Like the CSU, it is now possible to complain that they are basically only other European pots of money. And that this is any incentive for reform is taken. However, those who argue in this way must also ask themselves the opposite question: If the Greek crisis had become so dramatic for the citizens and so expensive for the lenders, would one have already had the opportunity to counteract this, which the new money pots offer? Certainly not.

If there is anything fundamental to criticize, it is the fact that it took so long for the Euro-rescuers to wake up; especially those in Germany. Angela Merkel, the only reigning politician who was instrumental in the process from the very beginning, has come a long way from her beginnings in 2010 when she demanded in Brussels to withdraw voting rights from states beyond their means. Or the loan commitments for Athens postponed, because they wanted to win only the state election in North Rhine-Westphalia – which went wrong. She was also the one who put through a haircut for banks and insurers, which in consequence brought other euro states such as Italy in the trouble, because the safe believed government bonds were no longer safe.

Greece has earned a leap of faith

It is not without irony that, even in the Greek crisis, cooperation with Paris was very close, albeit in a different way. France always jumped to the side of Athens when it came to preventing the worst. Remember the summer of 2015, when it came to the showdown between Berlin and Paris. Germany demanded the exclusion of Greece from the euro. France vetoed. Merkel came out face-to-face because she allegedly enforced harsh conditions with the Greek government on a dramatic night last night. For example, a privatization fund, which should be filled with 50 billion euros. And the financial contribution of the International Monetary Fund.

Both positions Merkel silently vacated. Nevertheless, Greece is still in the euro, the country will end the third loan program. Is that all good? No, this conclusion would be negligent. Greece spent half of its life with the euro under the thumb of lenders. The first steps to freedom will be tedious, one does not know if investors trust the country to be solid on its own. This is also clear to the lenders, which is why they provide Athens with a financial cushion. It will be enough to pay all financial liabilities until 2022, ie beyond the next federal election. You can criticize that again. Or interpret it as an advance of trust. Athens, for its part, can prove that it deserves it.

Juncker wants to launch concrete measures

According to the will of the EU Commission President, there should be a “flexible joint take-back mechanism” close to the internal borders and penalties for asylum seekers if they do not remain in the country of their first registration. By Daniel Brössler, Brussels, and Nico Fried, Berlin more …

MytripleA at the LendIt Europe fair in London

MytripleA at the LendIt Europe fair in London

MytripleA participated last week in Lendit, the main conference of the “P2P lending” sector. This year Lendit had 750 participants including platforms, investors and service providers which has been a large increase compared to 400 the previous year and highlights the great moment the sector is experiencing.

Sergio Antón, co-founder of MytripleA, and Sylvia Lara, risk director (meet the rest of the team here), attended the conference as sponsors and our stand received numerous visits from other platforms, international journalists and investors.

Likewise, Sergio Antón made a very successful presentation of assistance to numerous international investors, who showed great interest in our market.

MytripleA was the first Spanish platform to attract foreign institutional money through the firm GLI Capital . Said investor is investing in the loans generated by MytripleA under the same conditions as the rest of the investors.

LendIt revealed several aspects:

  • Exponential growth of the platform intermediation volume.
  • A clear trend towards the entry of institutional investors in the purchase of loans generated by platforms.
  • Leadership of the United Kingdom in terms of knowledge of the sector, political support and growth.

Europe is bracing itself for a trade war

After Trump’s announcement of punitive tariffs State-mandated silence in China

At the core, however, it’s about much more than just economic retribution. The EU wants to counter Trump’s nationalist policies and position itself as an advocate of open markets. Trade Commissioner Malmström is certain, “The US measures will have a negative impact on transatlantic relations.” The EU will seek a dispute settlement procedure with the WTO as soon as possible. The cause of the problems in the steel and aluminum sectors are “global overcapacities caused by non-market based production”.

That’s what China means. Malmström wants to resolve the dispute in the conversation: “This sole action of the United States will not help.” The EU definitely wants to avoid being caught between the fronts. Because if Chinese steel loses its sales market in the US, more of it will be sold to Europe. Trump’s calculation: The Europeans would then also raise duties. The EU does not want that, but it could come about to protect the European steel industry with more than 300,000 jobs.

Beijing will host the National People’s Congress on Monday, the most important political event of the year. And that should not be disturbed by any means. Eventually, the more than 3,000 delegates will confirm the almighty state and party leader Xi Jinping for another term as President of the People’s Republic, and Prime Minister Li Keqiang will continue for five years. Add to this a well-known constitutional amendment that will cement the power of Xi Jinping. At the request of the Communist Party, the People’s Congress is to decide that the President will not have to leave the country after ten years as before. China is well occupied with itself. People’s Congress on all channels. A crisis, a dispute with the United States? Wrong time. Trump’s punitive tariffs are not an issue, but silence.

The Consultative Conference will be held in Beijing in parallel with the People’s Congress – an advisory body peppered with a number of entrepreneurs, many of whom are billionaires. There will be the first press conference on Friday. Actually, the perfect stage to ask: What do the punitive tariffs mean for the Chinese economy? Are China’s companies adequately prepared? How will the state-owned companies respond that have built up huge overcapacity in steel but also for cement, aluminum or paper? Are retaliation planned? Is there a threat of a trade war between the two largest economies in the world? No answers, because nobody asks these questions. Everything is agreed, every word announcement before set. Not a single journalist from abroad is approached.

State tenders often involve Chinese manufacturers

State-mandated silence in China. Still. The propaganda can be very different too. When Trump threatened punitive tariffs last summer, there was great indignation. In the event of sanctions, Beijing threatened with retaliation. “If the US does not respect the facts and rules of multilateral trade and take measures that harm economic and trade relations, China will not stand idly by, but take appropriate measures to protect China’s legitimate rights and interests,” it said in a statement by the Ministry of Commerce.

It is above all the People’s Republic itself that systematically isolates itself like hardly any other economy. In many industries, foreign companies are only allowed to produce in China if they partner with a local partner, the profits must be shared. State tenders often involve Chinese manufacturers. According to a survey by the OECD Developed Countries (OECD), China is currently 59th out of 62 in terms of openness to foreign direct investment. That means the market is tight. And it could be much more difficult.

What a Chinese reaction might look like, the Global Times had already sketched shortly after Trump’s election victory: “A batch of Boeing orders would be replaced by Airbus, American cars and iPhones would have a hard time in China, and imports of soybeans and corn would be stopped. ” Chinese students in the US? Not allowed anymore. The state and above all the Communist Party have almost unlimited penetration in the People’s Republic. However, China’s bargaining position is not nearly as good as the government’s. In particular, punitive tariffs would hit China’s export industry, which has shipped about 20 percent of its goods to the United States. Mass layoffs and reduced economic growth could be the result – a horror vision for President Xi and his colleagues.

In Europe there is little hope that Trump will give in. Nonetheless, there are likely to be many phone calls over the weekend between Paris, Berlin and Washington. The chances of success are low. Trump writes on Twitter: “If a country (USA) loses billions of dollars in trade with almost every country it does business with, trade wars are good and easy to win.”

Europe’s rules also apply to Internet monopolists

Punishment for Facebook Europe’s rules also apply to Internet monopolists

Facebook has lied to the EU Commission, but the punishment for it seems rather silly. If Facebook was a car driver, one might think that this is just a matter of parking wrong. The group from Silicon Valley has to pay 110 million euros, because he did not tell the truth when he took over the short message service Whatsapp. Of course, 110 million euros are a lot of money from the perspective of a normal person. Compared to the absurd purchase price of 16 billion euros that Facebook paid for Whatsapp, it is little; and that’s why the company pays the penalty rather quickly than being in public criticism.

The EU Commission is thus, albeit unintentionally, the signal to all Internet companies: Lies us happy if you want to expand. Trick if you think it necessary. Will not be so expensive for you, if you fly up. Because Facebook is not just any company, but has almost two billion registered customers: more than any other Internet company in the world, even more than Google, the search, video and data services probably use more people, but usually without logging in there , Facebook has a tremendous power of data, it knows mail addresses and friend lists, likes and dislikes, even the states of mind of its users.

Europe can not be dictated to the rules of the network

This data power has further expanded the company with the purchase of WhatsApp, with a messaging service that is used by now one billion people. Facebook had promised the EU Commission a careful handling of the data. It would not merge the social network and the messaging service, would not automatically create uniform profiles for users who use both; and you could not do that technically. Could you then – and did it two years later too.

EU imposes 110 million euro penalty on Facebook

Those responsible for the social network are said to have made false statements before taking over WhatsApp. The EU Commission wants to set an example with its decision. more …

The procedure corresponds to a pattern that can be observed again and again in companies from the American West Coast. They stretch (or even break) rules and laws – and see how far they get away with it. Maybe nobody says anything. Apple, Amazon and Starbucks have done so with their tricky tax models, their company constructs were once approved in Ireland, sometimes in the Netherlands or Luxembourg – but they were in contravention of EU law. Airbnb has done so and overruled existing rental rules in many European cities. Also the driving service Uber broke again and again right and its drivers against, o-tone of the Uber bosses, “an asshole called taxi” compete, although the German transport laws did not allow this so.

Innovation does not justify an intentional breach of the law

Now it is a good idea to discuss whether some laws in Germany are antiquated and no longer fit into the digital age – such as the requirement that taxi drivers know all the streets of a city by heart (as if there is no navigation system); or the requirement that limousine services return to their garage after each journey before being allowed to accommodate a new passenger (as if there were not enough traffic jams). But this does not justify a deliberate law break.

Europe therefore does well to create a legal framework for the digital world. Because the Internet must not be a space in which a few powerful corporations simply define what works – and what does not. That concerns the tax law: Who trades with data, has much more possibilities to trick with the taxes, than industrial companies, which must physically move goods. And also for monopolies other rules apply in the digital sphere: Whether Internet companies dominate a market, depends not so much on the turnover (the crucial size in the previous antitrust law), but on how much data they control. The new monopolists have a lot of data. So how should the rules be designed for the digital world? It must be prevented that Wildwestmethoden à la Uber make school. On the other hand, the question is worth noting whether some paragraphs created 50 or 100 years ago need to be modernized in order to make better use of the possibilities of digitization.

This differentiated approach represents an opportunity for Europe. The old world can counter the rampant net American-style net capitalism with its model of a new, digital world that is intelligently regulated. In the end, everyone profits from it and not just a few powerful internet companies.

Uncertainty in European stock markets: The Ibex loses 8,000 points

Bearish session on Wednesday in the European stock markets, which fall around 0.5% on average because of fears about the political and economic uncertainty in the European Union (EU) generated by the Brexit vote. The Ibex falls more than 1%, which makes it lose 8,000 points.

The growing anxiety over the consequences of the UK decision to leave the EU has continued to affect markets. Asian stocks have fallen overnight with investors seeking refuge in safe haven values, which has led to bonds at historic lows.

Investors have begun to look at safer assets, such as US Treasury bonds. The stock market crash began on Tuesday, as investors have begun to look at safer assets , such as US Treasuries, the yen and the dollar after the Bank of England relaxed the regulations to encourage investors. Banks to lend more money.

Concern over the polarization of the vote and growth dragged the US stocks to close down on Tuesday, reaching the minimum historical 10-year Treasury bonds.

On the other hand, the UK’s Minister of the Interior, Theresa May, has taken the lead in the race to find a new leader for the Conservative Party and for the British Prime Minister. May took advantage in a first round of voting on Tuesday against Liam Fox, who was eliminated from the race with the least amount of votes and Stephen Crabb who withdrew from the dispute, leaving Andrea Leadsom and Michael Gove and Theresa May to wait of another round of voting this Thursday.

Also read: Technical analysis office: we solve your doubts about all types of market values

Italian banks remain the target of investors. The shares of Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena were suspended after the European Central Bank asked the bank to cut its bad debt by 40% over the next three years, according to Reuters. On the other hand, Italian regulators have temporarily banned short trading on the stock market.

At the macroeconomic level, the words of Mario Draghi, who speaks at 09:00, Madrid time, are particularly relevant. Data on non-farm ADP employment, service PMI, non-manufacturing PMI of the ISM and minutes of the Federal Reserve (Fed) meeting in the US are also presented.

Trade war – Europe must rely on free trade

Trade dispute Those who want wealth need free trade

The US imposed billions in punitive tariffs on Chinese goods on Friday. China imposed retaliatory duties of similar proportions shortly thereafter. Thus the trade war reaches a new dimension. Previously, the climate has already deteriorated between Europe and the US, the US punitive tariffs on steel and aluminum will be repaid by the EU with new tariffs. From the European side, US President Donald Trump is identified as vicious and guilty of such a war. Instead of reacting to punishments with retaliation, it would be better to look for a solution for the benefit of all. This solution is obvious: free trade is the best for EU and US citizens in the long term.

If “America First” aims to improve the lives of Americans and ensure that they can afford even more consumer goods, US President Trump should bet on free trade. Protectionism will not make the US top-notch again. In fact, the first negative effects of US punitive tariffs on the steel and aluminum processing industry in the US, whose costs have risen due to customs duties, are already apparent. In the end, these costs will be felt by US citizens because their consumption options are becoming less diverse and more expensive. The average, non-weighted EU tariffs are slightly higher than those of the US. Tariffs lead to lower trade flows, which makes a fair weighting scientifically difficult and already fills specialized books.

Trade conflict between Trump and China escalates

The US imposes the threatened punitive tariffs on Chinese goods valued at $ 34 billion. China reacts with counter-tariffs – and speaks of the “biggest trade war in economic history”. By Jan Schmidbauer more.

Both the US and the EU are pursuing a mutually costly protectionism. Tariffs, technical trade barriers and even subsidy measures for companies, for example to the US aircraft manufacturer Boeing and its European competitor Airbus, have been and are used by both sides. In this sense, the often described as narcissistic US President is only a mirror for the decision-makers in the EU, in which they prefer not to recognize.

Of course, tariffs and other trade barriers in the EU have not arisen because of malice against the US. Rather, they are the result of the particular interests of certain political actors in EU countries. Thus, current EU tariffs are by no means a welfare optimum for EU citizens. Rather, the current barriers to trade on the part of the EU are a political-economic balance of organized stakeholders in Brussels. They represent the degree of limited openness that the EU has granted to others through multilateral agreements. In other words, more openness was not possible in multilateral negotiations so far. A genuine policy of the “Europe First” would try to take less account of the existing particular interests for the benefit of the people and therefore rely on free trade with the USA and with other partners. Free trade means competition, lower prices, more variety and often better quality.

One could also muster understanding for Trump

Unfortunately, bilateral trade negotiations have also been less successful in the recent past. They have not led to a reduction of trade barriers between the EU and the US. Given the higher tariffs of the EU, one may take a new view and understand the action of the US President as a reaction, punishment and lesson for Brussels: the EU should dismantle its trade barriers with the US. If you look at Twitter, the preferred communication channel of the US president, then he gets upset about comparatively high barriers to trade, sometimes pleads for free trade, calls for the abolition of barriers and a stop subsidies. He seems to know and to reproduce the basic knowledge of a broad economic literature. The US ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, expressed similar opinion, saying that he had at least made a complete renunciation of car tolls in the automotive sector, even if Europe did not want to do so.

The new US tariffs are formally juristically justified with the argument that national security would be endangered. That’s ridiculous, of course. The truth is that the customs policy of the EU, which is not explicitly malicious but harmful to the US, should probably be punished. The term used “punitive tariffs” is a proof of this. In that sense, one might consider the US punitive action as a “Like me, I see you” strategy. Historically higher EU tariffs will be compensated – at a later date – with US tariffs. That is unattractive and unfair because the US has so far accepted the EU trade barriers. Above all, Trump blames his predecessors for not achieving good negotiating results. Now he wants to change that and introduces punitive tariffs to persuade the EU to make new deals. Some understanding of this late punitive action could be found, especially because of the past failure of bilateral negotiations for further mutual trade opening.

Consequences of the departure of the European Union. The Brexit

The Brexit

It rains in England … and today more than ever. As a result of the departure of the European Union from the United Kingdom we want to tell you all that this entails, as has been the process, why this situation has been reached and consequences of the departure of the European Union from the United Kingdom.

What fostered the Brexit?

Many of the inhabitants of the United Kingdom have the belief that, since they are part of the European Union, the United Kingdom has not been the same, longing to make their own decisions regarding their country and not depend on a Union of countries . On the other hand, those in favor of permanence, most of them young, supported continuity in Europe by having opinions such as “together we are better” and “this is how progress is supported”. In summary, a country totally divided.

 

To keep in mind with the law in hand

“The Treaty of Lisbon configures the right of withdrawal as a” unilateral right “of all the Member States of the Union. This is so, firstly, because the state interested in withdrawing from the Union does not request, but rather notifies the European Council of its willingness to cease to belong to the Union as a Member State. Second, because the withdrawal is not subject to any type of condition. And, third, because the withdrawal is not conditioned to the fulfillment of any requirement. “

 

The result of the referendum

After the vote of the British, with a very tight result, the Brexit has won, after an optimistic attitude on the part of all Europe just before preserving again and again a victory of the permanence, although it always adjusts. The exit of the European Union, voted by only 51.9% of the voters, with a difference of more than one million votes, makes the highest participation of the last 2 years. In short, a divided country, a very tight result and that hints at a period of great uncertainty for the United Kingdom and the entire European Union.

 

Has the entire UK voted against continuing in the European Union?

No, Scotland and Northern Ireland have voted in favor of permanency with 62% and 55.8% respectively. Like the city of London that has also voted in favor of permanence. The leader of the Scottish nationalist party announced, if the result was the exit of the Union, that it would organize an internal referendum again. We’ll see what happens.

As a result of the result of the referendum, David Cameron has announced his resignation this morning as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom that will be effective from October after the congress of his party.

 

And now that?

Now they touch on the long negotiations with the European Union to mark the conditions for the exit of the Union. Therefore, it will not be an immediate exit, there is even talk of a period of 2 years until the exit of the European Union is effective.

Right now the markets are reeling from the situation of uncertainty and both the Pound, the Euro, and the IBEX fall.

From the moment that the United Kingdom leaves the European Union, it would no longer have a free movement of goods, therefore, both British companies that sell abroad and other companies from other countries that sell in the United Kingdom would be harmed. As of that moment they will be affected by a tariff.

 

Concerns of the Spanish

Other questions that we raise more Spaniards is what will happen to all Spaniards who are working in England, which is estimated to be about 200,000 people. It is expected that in the medium term they will have to apply for a work permit.

Another concern that touches the Spanish closer is what will be the situation in Gibraltar, where it has gained permanence by almost 96%, and where is the concern of the Spanish working in Gibraltar, as vice versa.

All these questions will be clarified with time. There will be things that will change, we will see and we can only say time to time.